Urinary chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 16 and endostatin as predictors of tubulointerstitial fibrosis in patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is a well-recognized risk factor for poor renal outcome in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). However, a noninvasive biomarker for IFTA is currently lacking. The purpose of this study was to identify urinary markers of IFTA and to determine their clinical relevance as predictors of renal prognosis. METHODS: Seventy patients with biopsy-proven isolated DKD were enrolled in this study. We measured multiple urinary inflammatory cytokines and chemokines by multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in these patients and evaluated their association with various pathologic features and renal outcomes. RESULTS: Patients enrolled in this study exhibited advanced DKD at the time of renal biopsy, characterized by moderate to severe renal dysfunction [mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 36.1 mL/min/1.73 m2] and heavy proteinuria (mean urinary protein:creatinine ratio 7.8 g/g creatinine). Clinicopathologic analysis revealed that higher IFTA scores were associated with worse baseline eGFR (P < 0.001) and poor renal outcome (P = 0.002), whereas glomerular injury scores were not. Among measured urinary inflammatory markers, C-X-C motif ligand 16 (CXCL16) and endostatin showed strong correlations with IFTA scores (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), and patients with higher levels of urinary CXCL16 and/or endostatin experienced significantly rapid renal progression compared with other patients (P < 0.001). Finally, increased urinary CXCL16 and endostatin were independent risk factors for poor renal outcome after multivariate adjustments (95% confidence interval 1.070-3.455, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary CXCL16 and endostatin could reflect the degree of IFTA and serve as biomarkers of renal outcome in patients with advanced DKD.

Serum endostatin levels correlate with enhanced extracellular matrix degradation and poor patients' prognosis in bladder cancer.

Endostatin, the proteolytic fragment of collagen XVIII, is an inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Interestingly, elevated circulating endostatin levels have been found to correlate with poor patients' prognosis in several cancers. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of endostatin in bladder cancer (BC) and to gain insight into the mechanisms involved in its production. This retrospective study included a total of 337 patients with BC and 103 controls. Collagen XVIII gene expression was analyzed using real-time PCR (n = 82). Endostatin tissue localization was assessed by immunohistochemistry (n = 27). Endostatin serum (n = 87) and urine (n = 153) levels were determined by ELISA. In 12 cases, both serum and paraffinized tissue samples from the same patients were available. We found decreased collagen XVIII tissue expression and increased endostatin urine and serum concentration in samples of patients with BC compared to controls. High serum endostatin levels correlated with the presence of lymph node metastases and MMP-7 concentrations and were independently associated with poor metastasis-free and disease-specific survival. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a strong endostatin staining in the wall of tumor associated blood vessels in superficial but not in muscle-invasive BCs. Based on these, we concluded that elevated endostatin levels in patients with BC are the consequence of enhanced extracellular matrix degradation and are independent from collagen XVIII expression. Furthermore, serum endostatin levels may provide prognostic information independent from histopathological parameters and may therefore help to optimize therapy decisions. Loss of endostatin expression in tumor associated blood vessels might represent an important step supporting tumor-induced angiogenesis.

Clinical value of vascular endothelial growth factor and endostatin in urine for diagnosis of bladder cancer.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine whether urinary VEGF and endostatin predict the presence of bladder cancer, and whether these noninvasive biomarkers provide clinically useful information in the bladder cancer patient as well. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Voided urine samples were collected from 239 patients (109 bladder cancers, 81 urological disorders, 49 healthy controls). The urine levels of VEGF and endostatin were determined with the sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique. RESULTS: Urine levels of VEGF and endostatin were higher in patients with bladder cancer than those in patients with urological disorders and healthy controls (P <0.01). The difference between patients with urological disorder and healthy controls was significant only for VEGF (P <0.01). Urine level of VEGF was related to the tumor grade, and urine level of endostatin was related to tumor stage, tumor size and tumor number (P <0.05). The optimal cutoffs for VEGF and endostatin were calculated by the ROC curves as 860 pg/ml for VEGF, and 350 pg/ml for endostatin. The five-year survival rate was 60.0% in patients with low level of endostatin (<350 pg/ml) and 7.69% in patients with high level of endostatin (≥350 pg/ml) in the bladder cancer group. Patients with a high level of endostatin had a shorter survival time, whereas patients with a low level of endostatin had a longer survival time (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Urine levels of VEGF and endostatin may be a clinically useful aid in the diagnosis of bladder cancer, and endostatin but not VEGF is a supplementary prognostic marker for predicting tumor progression.

Urinary angiostatin levels are elevated in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The poor prognosis associated with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is due to the lack of overt early symptoms and the absence of reliable diagnostic screening methods. Since many tumors over express angiogenic regulators, the purpose of this study was to determine whether elevated levels of the angiogenic or angiostatic molecules vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), endostatin (ES), and angiostatin (AS) were elevated in plasma and urine from patients with EOC. METHODS: VEGF, HGF, ES and AS were assayed by ELISA in samples from pilot cohort consisting of healthy women (N=48; pre-menopausal N=23, post-menopausal N=25), women with benign gynecological disease (N=54), patients with primary peritoneal cancer (PP) (N=2) and EOC (N=35). Wherever possible, parallel serum samples were measured for CA125 levels by ELISA. RESULTS: AS was the angioregulator that independently discriminated EOC patients from healthy individuals. Levels of urinary AS (uAS) from healthy individuals or women with benign gynecological disease averaged 21.4 ng/mL+/-3.7 and 41.5 ng/mL+/-8.8, respectively. In contrast, uAS averaged 115 ng/mL+/-39.2 and 276 ng/mL+/-45.8 from women with Stage I (N=6) and late stage (N=31) EOC, respectively. Furthermore, uAS was elevated in EOC patients regardless of tumor grade, stage, size, histological subtype, creatinine levels, menopausal status, or patient age, but appeared to complement CA125 measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of AS are elevated in the urine of patients with EOC and may be of diagnostic and/or prognostic clinical importance. Further studies of uAS as a biomarker for EOC alone or in combination with other markers are warranted.